Donor economics
Building a Monthly Giving Program That Sticks
Recurring gifts are the steadiest money a nonprofit has. Here is how to build the program that produces them.
By Donor Insights · Published August 18, 2026 · Updated August 27, 2026 · 7 min read
Enter your email and we will send the PDF, plus the daily stewardship read each morning. You can unsubscribe from any email.
Key takeaways
- Monthly giving was 27% of all online revenue in 2025 and grew 12% (M+R Benchmarks). One-time giving grew faster, 17%, in a year of emergency response, which is exactly why the case for monthly is retention rather than growth.
- Recurring donors are kept far better than one-time donors: 71% of sustainers are still giving a year after they start, against 24% of first-time one-time donors (M+R Benchmarks), so a sustainer's value builds year over year.
- The ask is the program: default the gift form to monthly, name a specific amount, and connect the recurring gift to an ongoing result.
- Recurring donors are 23% of the donor base but give 32% of revenue (Blackbaud donorCentrics, FY2024 data), so a small group of sustainers carries an outsized share of the budget.
- Donor Insights reads your own giving records to show what share of revenue is recurring and how your sustainers retain, while your team makes the ask in its own tools.
A monthly giving program is a standing invitation for a donor to give a set amount on a schedule, and it is the steadiest money most organizations have. The case is in the numbers: monthly giving was 27% of all online revenue in 2025 and grew 12%, and 71% of sustainers were still giving a year after they started, according to M+R Benchmarks. You build one by defaulting the gift form to monthly, asking for a specific amount, and doing the quiet work that keeps the gift alive after it starts.
Why build a monthly giving program?
Because recurring donors stay, and staying is where the value of a donor lives. In M+R's 2025 data, 71% of sustainers were still giving twelve months after they started, and a little more than half were still active after two full years, while only 24% of first-time one-time donors gave again. That gap is the whole argument. One-time giving grew faster than monthly in 2025, 17% against 12%, in a year of emergency response, which M+R calls a clear break from the long-term trend, so the case for a monthly program is not that it is where growth comes from. It is that a first-time donor is a long shot to give again next year, while a sustainer is closer to a sure thing, and each year they stay lowers what it cost to win them.
A monthly program also smooths the year. Instead of two or three appeal spikes and long flat stretches, a base of sustainers pays into every month, which makes budgeting less of a guess and gives the mission a floor it can count on. For the fuller picture of what a kept donor is worth over time, see our guide to donor lifetime value, and for the numbers that describe a healthy recurring base, recurring giving benchmarks.
How much of the money is already recurring?
More than most teams assume, and it is concentrated in a small group. Monthly giving was 27% of all online revenue in 2025, 22% at organizations raising under $1 million online and 37% at those raising over $10 million (M+R Benchmarks). Blackbaud's donorCentrics data (FY2024) shows recurring donors making up 23% of the donor base while giving 32% of total revenue. Fewer than one in four donors is carrying close to a third of the money.
| Measure | Recurring donors | All donors |
|---|---|---|
| Share of the donor base | 23% | 100% |
| Share of total revenue | 32% | 100% |
The lesson is not that recurring donors are worth more per gift. It is that they keep giving, so a modest monthly amount compounds into the largest reliable line on the budget. That is why growing the recurring share is one of the highest-return moves a fundraising team can make.
How do you ask for a monthly gift?
The ask is the program. Most donors give monthly because they were invited to, on a form that made it the easy choice, so the design of the ask does more than any later campaign. Work in this order:
- 1.Default the gift form to monthly, or at least give it equal weight, so a donor has to opt out of recurring rather than opt in.
- 2.Name a specific monthly amount and tie it to a concrete result, so the donor sees what a steady gift does rather than a blank field.
- 3.Make the recurring choice one click, with no extra steps that give a donor a reason to fall back to a single gift.
- 4.Thank the donor the moment the first monthly gift lands, and again when the second one processes, so the habit feels seen.
What mechanics make a monthly gift stick?
Getting the gift is half the job. Keeping it means tending the machinery underneath, because a sustainer can lapse without ever deciding to leave. The habits that hold a program together:
- Keep the card on file current, because expired and reissued cards quietly end gifts the donor still meant to give.
- Recover failed payments quickly with timed retries and a short update-your-card message, since a decline is usually a payment problem, not a decision.
- Steward on a cadence: show sustainers the ongoing result of their standing gift, not just an annual receipt.
- Make it easy to pause, change the amount, or update details, so a donor in a tight month steps down instead of canceling outright.
- Watch your sustainer retention curve by cohort, so an early drop is visible while you can still act on it.
“Increasing customer retention rates by 5% increases profits by 25% to 95%.”
Donors are not customers, and the parallel is imperfect, but the direction holds. A monthly program lives or dies on retention, so the plumbing that keeps a gift processing is worth as much attention as the campaign that won it. Your donor retention rate is the number that tells you whether the base is holding.
What is a sustainer worth over time?
Far more than the monthly amount suggests, because tenure compounds. In M+R's 2025 data, a typical one-time online donor gave 1.3 times for $183 across the year, while a $25 sustainer who stays the year gives $300, and 71% of sustainers do stay. To see how that plays out on a program, picture a fictional organization, Cedar Hollow Aid, that signs up 500 new monthly donors at an average of $25 a month. The numbers below are illustrative.
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| New monthly donors | 500 |
| Average monthly gift | $25 |
| First-year value if all 500 stay | $150,000 |
| Value if 71% are retained into year two | $106,500 |
| Two-year value of the cohort | $256,500 |
The single gift form on the same page might have raised $25 once from each of those donors. As a monthly ask, the same 500 people return six figures across two years, and the ones who stay start a climb that a one-time file never begins. That compounding is why building the program repays the effort many times over. Donor Insights reads your own giving records and shows what share of revenue is already recurring and how your sustainers retain, so you can steward the base while your team makes each ask in its own CRM or email tool.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a monthly giving program?
- It is a standing arrangement for donors to give a set amount on a recurring schedule, usually monthly. It matters because 71% of sustainers are still giving a year after they start, against 24% of first-time one-time donors (M+R Benchmarks), so the gifts compound into the steadiest line on the budget.
- How much of nonprofit revenue is recurring?
- Monthly giving was 27% of all online revenue in 2025 and grew 12%, with one-time giving up 17% in a year of emergency response (M+R Benchmarks). In Blackbaud's donorCentrics data (FY2024), recurring donors are 23% of the donor base but give 32% of total revenue.
- How do you get more donors to give monthly?
- Design the ask: default the gift form to monthly or give it equal weight, name a specific amount tied to a concrete result, and keep the recurring choice to one click. Roughly 64% of nonprofits still default their forms to one-time, so changing the default alone reframes the ask for every visitor.
- Why do monthly donors stop giving?
- Often not by choice. Expired or reissued cards and temporary declines quietly end gifts a donor still meant to give, so recovering failed payments and keeping cards current is as important as the original ask. The rest is stewardship: sustainers who never hear the result of their gift drift away.
Sources
- M+R Benchmarks 2026 (2025 data), Fundraising: monthly giving share and growth, sustainer retention curve, one-time donor value
- M+R Benchmarks via NonProfitPRO (share of nonprofits defaulting forms to one-time)
- Blackbaud donorCentrics Sustainer Summit (FY2024 data), recurring donor and revenue share
- Harvard Business Review, The Value of Keeping the Right Customers (Bain & Company)
Related articles
Recurring Giving Benchmarks: Is Your Monthly Program Actually Healthy?
A monthly program can grow its revenue while quietly losing sustainers. Three health metrics tell you which is happening.
How to Calculate Donor Lifetime Value (and Why the Simple Formula Lies)
The three-number formula is easy. It also overstates what a donor is worth, because it assumes retention never changes.
How to Calculate Donor Retention Rate (Formula, Example, Benchmarks)
The formula takes two minutes. Reading it well is where the money is.
Disclaimer
Educational purpose. This article is published for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not investment, financial, funding, donor, tax, legal, accounting, or fundraising advice, and reading it creates no advisory, fiduciary, or client relationship. Consult your own qualified professionals before making decisions.
Not an offer. Nothing here is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy, sell, donate to, or fund any organization or security. Pray, Inc. DonorInsights.com is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, law firm, accounting firm, or fundraising counsel, and publishes only impersonal commentary of general and regular circulation.
Public data, no guarantee. Analyses of named organizations rely on public sources such as IRS Form 990 filings, an organization's own published materials, and reputable press. These sources are believed reliable but are not audited or independently verified by us. The content may contain errors or omissions and is provided "as is" with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or currency.
Opinions and estimates. Donor-level and financial figures for named organizations are our inferences and opinions, including forward-looking projections that are not guarantees of future results.
No affiliation. Named organizations are independent and are not clients, affiliates, sponsors, or endorsers of DonorInsights.com. Third-party names and trademarks belong to their owners and are used only for identification and commentary. Links to third-party sites are not endorsements.
No reliance. We accept no liability for any action taken based on this content.
Corrections. This analysis reflects public sources available as of publication. If you are an organization discussed here, or any reader, and you believe a figure or statement is inaccurate, email hello@donorinsights.com and we will review it and correct any error promptly.
Your use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use.