Donor economics
Where Donation Pages Lose the Gift
Mobile brings in over half the visitors and about a quarter of the online money. The page is where that gap opens.
By Donor Insights · Published October 2, 2026 · Updated September 7, 2026 · 8 min read
Enter your email and we will send the PDF, plus the daily stewardship read each morning. You can unsubscribe from any email.
Key takeaways
- In 2025, 1.6% of nonprofit website visitors made a donation, and the average visit was worth $1.33 in revenue (M+R Benchmarks 2026).
- Donation pages converted 11% of their visitors on desktop and 8% on mobile, so the average page loses roughly nine of every ten people who reach it.
- Mobile devices carried 52% of nonprofit website traffic in 2025, while desktop users made 57% of donation transactions and gave 72% of online revenue (M+R Benchmarks 2026).
- The average desktop gift was $168 against $88 on mobile, so mobile weakness costs twice: fewer completed gifts and smaller ones.
- Fix the page before buying traffic: measure conversion by device, cut every field and link the page does not need, and give the mobile page the same care the desktop page gets.
Donation pages lose most of the people who reach them. In 2025, donation pages converted 11% of their visitors on desktop and 8% on mobile, according to the M+R Benchmarks study of 180 nonprofits. Put plainly, roughly nine of every ten people who arrive at the page, already interested enough to click a donate button, leave without giving. This article is about everything on the page except the amounts. The gift array, the preset amounts a donor picks from, has its own guide: where the middle button should be.
How many website visitors actually give?
Very few, which is why each step of the path matters. Across the M+R study, 1.6% of nonprofit website visitors made a donation in 2025, and the average visit generated $1.33 in revenue. Scaled up, those averages say a thousand website visitors are worth about sixteen donors and $1,330. Two gates stand between a visitor and a gift: reaching the donation page at all, and then completing it. The second gate is the one this article is about, because it is the one you control completely.
The channel those visitors feed is growing. Online revenue for the average nonprofit rose 15% in 2025, and one-time online revenue rose 17% (M+R Benchmarks 2026). A page that converts poorly wastes a rising tide: every point of page conversion you give up is taken out of a channel that is expanding on its own.
Where does the mobile gap open?
At the device level, and it opens wide. Mobile devices carried 52% of nonprofit website traffic in 2025, yet desktop users made 57% of donation transactions and gave 72% of online revenue. The average desktop gift was $168 against $88 on mobile, and mobile accounted for 43% of online donations. The majority of your audience arrives on the device where the page converts worst and the gifts run smallest.
| What M+R measured | 2025 figure |
|---|---|
| Share of website traffic from mobile devices | 52% |
| Donation page conversion on desktop | 11% |
| Donation page conversion on mobile | 8% |
| Average gift on desktop | $168 |
| Average gift on mobile | $88 |
| Share of donation transactions from desktop | 57% |
| Share of online revenue from desktop | 72% |
Mobile weakness costs twice. A phone visitor is less likely to finish the page, and when they do finish, the gift is around half the size of a desktop gift. Some of that is who gives on which device, and some of it is a page that was designed at a desk and merely tolerated on a phone. The sector numbers cannot split those causes for you, but your own numbers can: run conversion and average gift by device on your page, and you will see which half of the gap is yours to close.
What friction actually loses the gift?
The page loses people at every point where it asks for effort the gift does not require. No current public study puts a defensible effect size on any single fix, so what follows is practitioner guidance, not a benchmark. The usual suspects, roughly in the order donors meet them:
- Navigation menus and outbound links that give an almost-donor somewhere else to go.
- Form fields beyond what the payment and the receipt require. Every extra question is a small exit.
- Multi-step checkouts where one screen would do, especially on a phone.
- Payment that means typing a sixteen-digit card number on a phone keyboard instead of using the wallet already on the device.
- Required account creation before the gift can be completed.
- A layout that needs pinch-zooming, small tap targets, or a slow load on a mobile connection.
What about the amounts on the buttons?
The gift array deserves its own attention, and it has its own article: ask-amount anchoring covers where the middle button should sit and why a renewal ask should never anchor below a donor's prior gift. One amount decision does belong here, because it is a page-layout decision: the monthly option. Monthly giving made up 27% of all online revenue in 2025, so a page that hides its monthly option behind a toggle or a separate link is hiding the sector's steadiest revenue stream. If you are building that stream, start with the monthly giving program guide.
What should you measure and fix first?
Start with the mobile page, because that is where the sector averages say the money leaks. A worked example makes the size of the leak concrete. The figures below are illustrative: they apply M+R's 2025 averages to a hypothetical 1,000 visitors reaching a donation page, split like sector traffic (520 mobile, 480 desktop).
| Scenario | Gifts | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 520 mobile visitors at 8% conversion and $88 | ≈ 42 | ≈ $3,660 |
| 480 desktop visitors at 11% conversion and $168 | ≈ 53 | ≈ $8,870 |
| The same 520 mobile visitors at the desktop 11% rate | ≈ 57 | ≈ $5,030 |
Closing the conversion gap alone, before touching gift size, is worth about $1,370 more per thousand page visitors in this example. The order of work follows from that:
- 1.Measure donation page conversion by device, never blended. A blended rate hides the mobile problem inside the desktop result.
- 2.Remove fields and links the page does not need, one change at a time, and watch the device-level numbers for a full month before the next change.
- 3.Rebuild the mobile page to be completed one-handed: wallet payments, large targets, one screen.
- 4.Put the monthly option in plain view rather than behind a toggle.
- 5.Only then spend on traffic. Every point of page conversion raises what a visitor is worth, which reprices every acquisition channel you buy.
The donation page is the cheapest place to raise online revenue, because the visitors are already there and already willing. Every person who reaches it was moved enough to click. Meeting that moment with a page that finishes cleanly on the device in their hand is stewardship of attention someone already gave you, and it pays before a single new visitor arrives.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a good donation page conversion rate?
- In 2025 the sector averages were 11% on desktop and 8% on mobile (M+R Benchmarks 2026). Treat those as context, not targets: the useful comparison is your own page's conversion by device, this month against last month, one change at a time.
- Why do mobile donation pages convert worse?
- The published data shows the gap (8% versus 11% conversion, $88 versus $168 average gift in 2025) but not the causes. Some of it is who gives on which device, and some is friction: typing card numbers on a phone, small targets, multi-step forms. Your own by-device numbers tell you which half is fixable.
- How much revenue is a nonprofit website visitor worth?
- The 2025 sector average was $1.33 in revenue per website visitor, with 1.6% of visitors making a gift (M+R Benchmarks 2026). Your own revenue per visitor is the number to price advertising against, and raising page conversion raises it without buying anyone new.
- Does a monthly option belong on the main donation page?
- Yes, in plain view. Monthly giving made up 27% of all online revenue in 2025 (M+R Benchmarks 2026), and a monthly option hidden behind a toggle or a separate page is a steady revenue stream kept out of sight at the one moment a donor is deciding.
- Should I redesign the whole donation page at once?
- No. Change one thing at a time and watch conversion by device for a full month, so you know which change moved the number. A full redesign can help or hurt, and either way it leaves you unable to say why.
Sources
Related articles
Ask Amount Anchoring: Where Should the Middle Button Be?
Donors read the suggested amounts on a form as advice about what a normal gift is. Put the gift you want in the middle.
Building a Monthly Giving Program That Sticks
Recurring gifts are the steadiest money a nonprofit has. Here is how to build the program that produces them.
Channel Attribution: Which Channel Gets Credit for a Gift?
A donor rarely gives on the first touch. How you credit the channels in between decides which ones you fund.
Disclaimer
Educational purpose. This article is published for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not investment, financial, funding, donor, tax, legal, accounting, or fundraising advice, and reading it creates no advisory, fiduciary, or client relationship. Consult your own qualified professionals before making decisions.
Not an offer. Nothing here is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy, sell, donate to, or fund any organization or security. Pray, Inc. DonorInsights.com is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, law firm, accounting firm, or fundraising counsel, and publishes only impersonal commentary of general and regular circulation.
Public data, no guarantee. Analyses of named organizations rely on public sources such as IRS Form 990 filings, an organization's own published materials, and reputable press. These sources are believed reliable but are not audited or independently verified by us. The content may contain errors or omissions and is provided "as is" with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or currency.
Opinions and estimates. Donor-level and financial figures for named organizations are our inferences and opinions, including forward-looking projections that are not guarantees of future results.
No affiliation. Named organizations are independent and are not clients, affiliates, sponsors, or endorsers of DonorInsights.com. Third-party names and trademarks belong to their owners and are used only for identification and commentary. Links to third-party sites are not endorsements.
No reliance. We accept no liability for any action taken based on this content.
Corrections. This analysis reflects public sources available as of publication. If you are an organization discussed here, or any reader, and you believe a figure or statement is inaccurate, email hello@donorinsights.com and we will review it and correct any error promptly.
Your use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use.