Donor retention
The Board Thank-You Call Program: Your Board's Five-Minute Fundraising Job
The highest-value board fundraising job asks for nothing.
By Donor Insights · Published September 22, 2026 · Updated September 7, 2026 · 8 min read
Enter your email and we will send the PDF, plus the daily stewardship read each morning. You can unsubscribe from any email.
Key takeaways
- In Penelope Burk's donor research, a thank-you call from a board member within 24 hours of a gift preceded next gifts 39% larger, and 42% higher giving fourteen months later.
- The call asks for nothing. That is what makes board members willing to do it and donors glad to receive it.
- Overall donor retention sat at 43.3% in 2025 and first-time retention at 18.9% (Fundraising Effectiveness Project), so gratitude aimed at new donors works on the weakest point of the file.
- Three five-minute calls per board member per week covers every first gift on many small files.
- Measure the program by the second-gift rate and next-year retention of called donors against the same group a year earlier.
The most valuable fundraising work a board member can do takes about five minutes and asks for nothing. In Penelope Burk's donor research, a thank-you call from a board member within 24 hours of a gift preceded a next gift 39% larger, and those donors were giving 42% more fourteen months later, according to a Neon One summary of the research. A board thank-you call program turns that finding into a routine: a short list of donors each week, a script with no ask in it, and a tally at the next board meeting.
Why should board members call donors at all?
Because most boards freeze when fundraising comes up, and the freeze comes from one assumption: that fundraising means asking people for money. Solicitation belongs with staff and with the few board members suited to it, alongside the major gift pipeline. Retention is the board-shaped job. It needs no training in ask strategy, no donor research, and no thick skin. It needs a person with standing in the organization to say thank you, and nobody carries more standing with a donor than a volunteer leader who gains nothing personally from the gift.
The state of the file makes the job urgent. Overall donor retention sat at 43.3% in 2025, and first-time donor retention at 18.9%, according to the Fundraising Effectiveness Project. Most of the donors an organization welcomes this year will not give next year, and the steepest losses sit exactly where a warm call lands hardest: the first gift.
There is a governance dividend too. Board-development practice, the kind The Fund Raising School's faculty teach, treats donor contact as part of how a board learns the organization it governs. A board member who has heard ten donors explain why they give understands the mission's constituency in a way no dashboard can supply, and long-tenured donors and their families come to know the board's voice across years of those calls.
What does the research say a board call is worth?
The reference point is Penelope Burk's donor-centered fundraising research, run in the 2000s and still the study every gratitude program cites. It is foundational research rather than a current benchmark, and its direction has held up: donors who received a personal thank-you call from a board member soon after giving went on to give more, sooner, and for longer than donors who received only a receipt.
| Finding | Result |
|---|---|
| Board-member call within 24 hours of the gift | Next gift 39% larger |
| Same donors, fourteen months later | Giving 42% higher |
| Personal thanks within 48 hours | About four times more likely to give again |
Later practitioner research points the same way and adds a compounding effect: first-time donors who received two or more thank-you calls within 90 days were retained at 58%, against 33% for donors who received none. That figure comes from practitioner data rather than peer-reviewed study, so treat it as a direction, not a promise. The direction matters, because the sector's own 2025 numbers say the first-time cohort is where retention is lost, and gratitude is the one lever that costs minutes instead of budget. The speed of the written thank-you is its own discipline, covered in thank-you timing. The call is a second, personal layer on top of it.
How do you run a board thank-you call program?
The program is a routine, not a campaign. Six moves make it run:
- 1.Pull a short list each week: every first-time donor, plus the largest gifts of the week. Fresh gifts only, so the call lands within a day or two of the gift.
- 2.Assign two to three calls per board member per week. Small enough to keep, large enough to matter.
- 3.Hand every caller the same one-page script, and make the script ask for nothing.
- 4.Count voicemail. A warm thirty-second message from a board member still says the gift was seen.
- 5.Log every call in the donor record, so staff know who has been thanked and the next appeal does not collide with the call.
- 6.Report the tally at every board meeting: calls assigned, calls made, one story from the week. What gets reported gets done.
A script that asks for nothing
The whole script is three beats. Who I am: a volunteer board member, not staff, calling for no other reason than the gift. What your gift touched: one concrete sentence about the work. Thank you: said plainly, then goodbye. If the donor wants to talk, listen and take notes for staff. If a donor asks how else to help, answer honestly and pass it on. The caller never raises money, upgrades, or events.
What can a board realistically cover?
More than most boards expect. Picture a fictional organization, Harbor Light Shelter, with ten board members and about 1,200 new gifts a year. The numbers here are illustrative, chosen to show the pattern. Three calls per member per week is thirty calls a week, roughly 1,500 a year, which covers every first gift on the file with room left for the week's largest gifts. A bigger file changes the target, not the method: cover every first-time donor first, then work down the gift list as capacity allows.
The economics favor the program because retention gains multiply. Adrian Sargeant's retention research, published in 2001, found that a 10% improvement in donor attrition can raise the projected lifetime value of a donor database by up to 200%, through longer giving, upgrades, and bequests, as summarized by Bloomerang. A board call program is one of the least expensive retention efforts an organization can mount: the cost is volunteer minutes, and the minutes land on the second gift, the single largest jump on the retention curve.
How do you know the program is working?
Watch two numbers a quarter. First, the second-gift rate of called first-time donors against the same cohort a year earlier, before the program existed. Second, next-year retention of called donors against your own file's prior rate. Both comparisons are against your own history, which is the honest baseline, since the donors a board chooses to call are never a random sample. Add one operational number: the share of assigned calls actually made, because the program fails quietly through skipped weeks long before it fails visibly in the retention rate.
Cohort views make this simple to keep honest. Donor Insights reads your giving records and tracks the first-time cohort's second-gift rate and retention over time, so the board sees the effect of its own calls in the file rather than in anecdotes. The methodology starts from your own gifts and contacts, and the board report writes itself from there.
Frequently asked questions
- Should board members ask for money on thank-you calls?
- No. The call works because it asks for nothing, and donors can tell the difference. Keep solicitation in its own lane with staff and the board members suited to it. If a donor volunteers interest in giving more, the caller listens and passes it to staff.
- What should a board member say on a thank-you call?
- Three beats: who I am (a volunteer board member, not staff), one concrete sentence about what the gift touched, and a plain thank you. Five minutes or less, and voicemail counts.
- How soon after a gift should the call happen?
- Within a day or two. Penelope Burk's research tied the strongest results to board calls within 24 hours of the gift, and the practical version of that is a weekly list pulled from fresh gifts, called the same week.
- Which donors should the board call first?
- First-time donors, then the week's largest gifts. First-time donors are retained at 18.9% (Fundraising Effectiveness Project, 2025), the weakest point on any file, so a warm call lands where the losses are steepest.
- How many calls should each board member make?
- Two or three a week is enough for most small and mid-sized files. Ten board members at three calls a week is roughly 1,500 calls a year, which covers every first gift on many files.
Sources
Related articles
How Fast Should You Thank a Donor?
Thank before you ask again. Speed and specifics in the thank-you shape whether the next gift ever comes.
The Second Gift: Why It Decides Whether a Donor Stays
The gift after the first one is where a donor relationship is kept or lost.
How to Calculate Donor Retention Rate (Formula, Example, Benchmarks)
The formula takes two minutes. Reading it well is where the money is.
Disclaimer
Educational purpose. This article is published for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not investment, financial, funding, donor, tax, legal, accounting, or fundraising advice, and reading it creates no advisory, fiduciary, or client relationship. Consult your own qualified professionals before making decisions.
Not an offer. Nothing here is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy, sell, donate to, or fund any organization or security. Pray, Inc. DonorInsights.com is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, law firm, accounting firm, or fundraising counsel, and publishes only impersonal commentary of general and regular circulation.
Public data, no guarantee. Analyses of named organizations rely on public sources such as IRS Form 990 filings, an organization's own published materials, and reputable press. These sources are believed reliable but are not audited or independently verified by us. The content may contain errors or omissions and is provided "as is" with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or currency.
Opinions and estimates. Donor-level and financial figures for named organizations are our inferences and opinions, including forward-looking projections that are not guarantees of future results.
No affiliation. Named organizations are independent and are not clients, affiliates, sponsors, or endorsers of DonorInsights.com. Third-party names and trademarks belong to their owners and are used only for identification and commentary. Links to third-party sites are not endorsements.
No reliance. We accept no liability for any action taken based on this content.
Corrections. This analysis reflects public sources available as of publication. If you are an organization discussed here, or any reader, and you believe a figure or statement is inaccurate, email hello@donorinsights.com and we will review it and correct any error promptly.
Your use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use.