Donor Insights

Donor economics

2026 Charitable Deduction Changes: What Your Largest Donors Lose, Worked for Three Donors

Two 2026 rules shrink the tax value of a large gift. This guide works the arithmetic for three fictional donors and shows what a development office should, and should not, say about it.

By Donor Insights · Published October 27, 2026 · Updated September 25, 2026 · 9 min read

Enter your email and we will send the PDF, plus the daily stewardship read each morning. You can unsubscribe from any email.

Key takeaways

  • From tax year 2026, an itemizing donor can deduct only the part of their charitable gifts above 0.5% of their contribution base, which is adjusted gross income before any net operating loss carryback (P.L. 119-21, Sec. 70425).
  • For filers in the 37% bracket, which starts above $768,700 of taxable income for a married couple in 2026 (IRS), all itemized deductions are reduced by 2/37, so each deducted dollar saves 35 cents of tax instead of 37 (P.L. 119-21, Sec. 70111).
  • The 35-cent limit covers mortgage interest, state and local taxes, and every other itemized deduction, not only charity, so calling it a charity-only cap is wrong.
  • In the IU Lilly Family School's simulation against prior law, the 37%-bracket limit lowers household giving by about $6.1 billion a year and the 0.5% floor by about $2.43 billion, the two largest negative effects in the law.
  • Development staff should understand the arithmetic, never give tax advice, and send any donor who asks about timing or bunching gifts to their own tax adviser.

The 2026 charitable deduction changes take tax value away from exactly the donors who give the most. Starting with tax year 2026, the federal tax law signed in July 2025 (Public Law 119-21) makes two changes for donors who itemize, meaning donors who list their deductions instead of taking the flat standard deduction. The first rule, in Section 70425, disallows the first 0.5% of a donor's contribution base in charitable gifts each year. The second rule, in Section 70111, trims every itemized deduction for filers in the top 37% bracket so that a deducted dollar saves 35 cents of tax instead of 37. A development office cannot change either rule, and it must not give tax advice. It can understand the arithmetic well enough to know why a major donor might ask about timing this November, and to send that donor to their adviser.

What is the 0.5% floor on charitable deductions?

Section 70425 adds a new subparagraph to Internal Revenue Code section 170. In the statute's words, a charitable contribution "shall be allowed only to the extent that the aggregate of such contributions exceeds 0.5 percent of the taxpayer's contribution base for the taxable year." The contribution base is defined in section 170(b)(1)(H) as adjusted gross income computed without any net operating loss carryback. For nearly every individual donor, that means adjusted gross income, the income figure on the tax return before deductions. The rule applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025, so gifts made in calendar 2026 are the first ones it touches.

The size of the floor scales with income, not with the gift. The Tax Foundation (Kraschel and York, November 2025) gives the example of a taxpayer with $200,000 of adjusted gross income and $10,000 of gifts, for whom the first $1,000 of giving is not deductible. Fidelity Charitable gives a second: a couple with $300,000 of adjusted gross income can deduct only the part of their gifts above $1,500.

0.5%
of a donor's contribution base (adjusted gross income, before any loss carryback) in charitable gifts is no longer deductible each year, starting with tax year 2026 — P.L. 119-21, Sec. 70425 (new IRC 170(b)(1)(I))

Two details matter for how donors react. First, the disallowed amount usually cannot be saved for a later year. The statute's new section 170(d)(1)(C) says amounts disallowed by the floor are "carried forward only from years in which limitation is exceeded," meaning years in which the donor's gifts already run past the existing percentage-of-income ceilings. For a typical itemizer, whose gifts sit well under those ceilings, the amount lost to the floor is simply lost. Second, the floor does not reach donors who do not itemize. Section 70425(a)(3) of P.L. 119-21, titled "Coordination with deduction for nonitemizers," amends the non-itemizer rule, IRC section 170(p), so that deduction is figured "without regard to" the floor in subsection (b)(1)(I).

What is the 35-cent limit for top-bracket donors?

Section 70111 rewrites Internal Revenue Code section 68. For an individual, itemized deductions are "reduced by 2/37 of the lesser of" two amounts: the itemized deductions themselves, or the part of taxable income (with the itemized deductions added back) that exceeds the point where the 37% bracket begins. In plain terms, a filer in the 37% bracket keeps 35/37 of each itemized dollar, so the dollar saves 35 cents of tax instead of 37. The IRS describes it as "a limitation on the tax benefit from itemized deductions for those taxpayers in the highest tax bracket (37%)." The Tax Foundation states the same effect as "35 cents per dollar, rather than the 37 cents."

Two corrections to how the rule is often described. It is not a cap on charity alone. It covers every itemized deduction, including mortgage interest and state and local taxes. And it reaches only the 37% bracket, which in 2026 begins above $640,600 of taxable income for a single filer and above $768,700 for a married couple filing jointly, according to the IRS's 2026 inflation adjustments. A donor in the 24% or 35% bracket is untouched by Section 70111 and faces only the 0.5% floor.

The two 2026 rules for itemizing donors, side by side (P.L. 119-21 and IRS.gov)
RuleStatuteWho it affectsWhat it does
0.5% floorSec. 70425, new IRC 170(b)(1)(I)Every itemizing individual donorDisallows gifts up to 0.5% of the contribution base each year, usually with no carryforward
Itemized-deduction limitSec. 70111, rewritten IRC 68Filers in the 37% bracket onlyReduces all itemized deductions by 2/37, so each deducted dollar saves 35 cents instead of 37

What do the 2026 charitable deduction changes cost three donors?

The three donors below are fictional and the math is illustrative. Each profile assumes the donor already itemizes because other deductions, such as mortgage interest and state and local taxes, exceed the 2026 standard deduction of $16,100 for a single filer or $32,200 for a married couple (IRS, IR-2025-103). Each assumes the donor's income, and so their marginal tax bracket, is the same in both years, uses the 2026 brackets published by the IRS, and gives cash to a public charity. Real returns have more moving parts, which is why the donor's adviser, not the development office, runs the real numbers.

  • Donor A is a single professional with $150,000 of adjusted gross income, taxed at 24% at the margin (the 2026 single 24% bracket runs from $105,700 to $201,775 of taxable income). Donor A gives $6,000 a year.
  • Donor B is a married couple with $300,000 of adjusted gross income, taxed at 24% at the margin (the 2026 joint 24% bracket runs from $211,400 to $403,550). The couple gives $10,000 a year.
  • Donor C is a married couple with $1,200,000 of adjusted gross income, well inside the 37% bracket, whose taxable income is above $768,700, so the full 2/37 reduction applies to their itemized deductions. The couple gives $50,000 a year.
Illustrative 2026 tax value of the same gifts with and without the new rules (fictional donors, computed from P.L. 119-21 and the IRS 2026 brackets)
DonorGiftLost to 0.5% floorTax saved, rules before 2026Tax saved, 2026 rulesLoss
A: single, $150,000 AGI, 24%$6,000$750$1,440$1,260$180
B: couple, $300,000 AGI, 24%$10,000$1,500$2,400$2,040$360
C: couple, $1,200,000 AGI, 37%$50,000$6,000$18,500$15,400$3,100

For Donors A and B the only change is the floor. Donor B's $1,500 of disallowed gifts, taxed at 24%, would have saved $360. Donor C meets both rules. The floor removes $6,000 of deductions, which at 37% would have saved $2,220. The remaining $44,000 of deductions now saves 35 cents per dollar instead of 37, which costs another $880. Together Donor C's gifts save $15,400 of tax where the same gifts would have saved $18,500 under the rules before 2026, a loss of $3,100, or about 17% of the old tax value. On a single $1,000 gift above the floor, a donor in the 37% bracket now saves $350 where the same gift saved $370.

$3,100
less tax saved on a fictional $1.2 million-income couple's $50,000 of gifts in 2026 than under the rules before 2026, from the 0.5% floor and the 35-cent limit together (illustrative) — Computed from P.L. 119-21, Secs. 70111 and 70425

How much giving could the new rules cost the sector?

The IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, in a study presented by CCS Fundraising and released March 17, 2026, simulated the law's effect on giving against the rules that would otherwise have applied. In its headline estimates, the 35-cent limit lowers household giving by about $6.1 billion a year (1.6%) and the 0.5% floor by about $2.43 billion (0.6%). Those are the two largest negative effects in the study. The new deduction for donors who do not itemize adds about $4.39 billion (1.1%), and a new 1% floor on corporate gifts removes about $1.55 billion. The net result is about $5.69 billion less giving a year, roughly 1% of U.S. giving, alongside about 8 million more households that give.

Two cautions keep the model in proportion. The figures are simulations that hold everything else constant, and the full report gives a range of plausible values for each estimate. They are not measured results, and the study itself says the effects "may not be fully seen in the first year the law is in effect." And the comparison is against prior law, so a modeled decline does not mean total giving will fall below its 2025 level. What the model does say clearly is where the pressure lands: on high-income households, the same donors whose gifts fill the top of most organizations' files.

“Changes that affect high-income households and large corporate donors have the greatest influence on total giving levels.”
Patrick M. Rooney, professor emeritus, IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, on the Philanthropy Outlook study (March 2026)

Why might a major donor ask about bunching gifts?

Bunching means combining two or more years of planned gifts into one tax year and giving little or nothing in the years between. Fidelity Charitable notes that "a bunching strategy or an approach of making larger gifts with less frequency can be more effective under the new rules." The reason follows from the floor. Suppose fictional Donor B gives $10,000 in 2026 and $10,000 in 2027 with the same income both years. The floor disallows $1,500 each year, $3,000 in total. If the couple instead gives $20,000 in 2026 and nothing in 2027, the floor disallows $1,500 once. Whether that trade is right for them depends on their other deductions in both years, which is a question for their adviser.

Bunching changes what a development office sees. A donor who gives two years of support in December 2026 and nothing in 2027 will appear lapsed in any annual retention report, where retention means the share of last year's donors who gave again this year. That donor has not left. Flag bunched gifts in the donor record, note the intended pattern, and keep stewarding the donor in the quiet year, so the file does not treat a planned pause as a loss. Our major gift pipeline guide covers how to track those relationships across years.

What should development staff say, and not say?

The rule for staff is short: explain what changed, never advise. Tax outcomes depend on a donor's full return, and a development officer who suggests a specific strategy is giving advice the organization is not qualified to give. A useful November conversation with a major donor covers five things:

  1. 1.Acknowledge that the rules changed for 2026 and that the donor may want to review timing with their tax adviser before year-end.
  2. 2.Offer to send a year-to-date giving summary, so the adviser has the donor's 2026 gift totals in hand.
  3. 3.Confirm your acknowledgment process. For any single gift of $250 or more, the IRS requires the donor to hold "a contemporaneous written acknowledgment" from the organization (IRS Topic 506), so prompt, accurate receipts matter more in a year when donors are reviewing their numbers.
  4. 4.If a donor mentions bunching or a donor-advised fund, listen, record the intended pattern, and let the adviser decide. For donors who do not itemize, the IRS states that gifts to donor-advised funds and supporting organizations do not qualify for the new $1,000 ($2,000 joint) deduction.
  5. 5.Keep the conversation about the work the gift does. The tax change alters what a gift costs the donor, and it leaves unchanged what the gift accomplishes.

The practical question for an organization is which of its donors these rules actually touch. Donor Insights reads your contacts and gifts, so you can see how much of your revenue comes from donors giving at levels where the floor and the 35-cent limit apply, and which of those donors might bunch. The methodology starts from your own giving records, and the platform shows whether a donor who skipped a year after a large December gift is resting or leaving, so the stewardship plan for 2027 is built on the donors you actually have.

Frequently asked questions

What are the 2026 charitable deduction changes for itemizers?
Two rules from P.L. 119-21 apply starting with tax year 2026. Section 70425 disallows charitable gifts up to 0.5% of the donor's contribution base, which is adjusted gross income before any loss carryback. Section 70111 reduces all itemized deductions by 2/37 for filers in the 37% bracket, so each deducted dollar saves 35 cents of tax instead of 37.
Is the 35% limit only for charitable gifts?
No. Section 70111 rewrites Internal Revenue Code section 68 and reduces all itemized deductions, including mortgage interest and state and local taxes. It applies only to filers in the 37% bracket, which in 2026 starts above $640,600 of taxable income for single filers and $768,700 for married couples filing jointly.
Can the amount lost to the 0.5% floor be carried forward?
Usually not. The statute allows a carryforward of floor-disallowed amounts only from years in which the donor's gifts already exceed the existing percentage-of-income ceilings. For a typical itemizer, the amount lost to the floor is simply lost.
Should a development officer recommend bunching gifts?
No. Bunching means giving two or more years of gifts in one tax year, and whether it helps depends on the donor's full return. Staff can explain that the rules changed and offer a year-to-date giving summary. The donor's tax adviser decides the strategy.
Does the 0.5% floor apply to the new $1,000 deduction for non-itemizers?
No. Section 70425(a)(3) of P.L. 119-21 amends IRC section 170(p) so the non-itemizer deduction is determined without regard to the 0.5% floor. The IRS states that the deduction covers cash gifts only, up to $1,000 or $2,000 for a joint return, and excludes gifts to donor-advised funds and supporting organizations.

Sources

  1. U.S. Congress (2025). Public Law 119-21, Secs. 70111, 70424 and 70425, including Sec. 70425(a)(3), coordination with deduction for nonitemizers (amending 26 U.S.C. 170(p)). Enrolled statute text, govinfo.gov.
  2. Cornell Legal Information Institute. 26 U.S. Code 170, including 170(b)(1)(H) (contribution base) and 170(b)(1)(I) (0.5-percent floor).
  3. Internal Revenue Service (2025). IRS releases tax inflation adjustments for tax year 2026. IR-2025-103 (2026 brackets, standard deduction, itemized-deduction limitation).
  4. Internal Revenue Service. One, Big, Beautiful Bill provisions (non-itemizer deduction, exclusions). Reviewed September 2026.
  5. Internal Revenue Service. Topic no. 506, Charitable contributions (records and the $250 acknowledgment rule). Reviewed September 2026.
  6. Kraschel, E., & York, E. (2025). Changes to Charitable Giving Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Tax Foundation, November 10, 2025.
  7. Fidelity Charitable (2025). One Big Beautiful Bill: impact on charitable giving (floor example, bunching). July 4, 2025.
  8. IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, presented by CCS Fundraising (2026). Philanthropy Outlook: Estimating Effects on Charitable Giving from the One Big Beautiful Bill. Release of March 17, 2026 (headline estimates vs prior law).

Disclaimer

Educational purpose. This article is published for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not investment, financial, funding, donor, tax, legal, accounting, or fundraising advice, and reading it creates no advisory, fiduciary, or client relationship. Consult your own qualified professionals before making decisions.

Not an offer. Nothing here is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy, sell, donate to, or fund any organization or security. Pray, Inc. DonorInsights.com is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, law firm, accounting firm, or fundraising counsel, and publishes only impersonal commentary of general and regular circulation.

Public data, no guarantee. Analyses of named organizations rely on public sources such as IRS Form 990 filings, an organization's own published materials, and reputable press. These sources are believed reliable but are not audited or independently verified by us. The content may contain errors or omissions and is provided "as is" with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or currency.

Opinions and estimates. Donor-level and financial figures for named organizations are our inferences and opinions, including forward-looking projections that are not guarantees of future results.

No affiliation. Named organizations are independent and are not clients, affiliates, sponsors, or endorsers of DonorInsights.com. Third-party names and trademarks belong to their owners and are used only for identification and commentary. Links to third-party sites are not endorsements.

No reliance. We accept no liability for any action taken based on this content.

Corrections. This analysis reflects public sources available as of publication. If you are an organization discussed here, or any reader, and you believe a figure or statement is inaccurate, email hello@donorinsights.com and we will review it and correct any error promptly.

Your use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use.