Deep dives
MAP International Reported $1.38 Billion in Revenue. Why Should You Read Its Cash and In-Kind Lines Separately?
A line-by-line read of MAP International's FY2025 Form 990, showing how donated medicine and cash gifts tell two different stories, and why every organization that accepts in-kind gifts should report them apart.
By Donor Insights · Published October 16, 2026 · 15 min read
Enter your email and we will send the PDF, plus the daily stewardship read each morning. You can unsubscribe from any email.
Key takeaways
- MAP International reported $1,379.0M in total revenue for the year ending September 30, 2025, up from $934.8M the year before (FY2025 Form 990, Part I, line 12).
- Noncash contributions, mostly donated medicine, were $1,362.5M, about 99% of the $1,375.4M in contributions (Part VIII, lines 1g and 1h). Cash contributions were about $12.9M by our arithmetic, against about $13.4M the year before.
- Fundraising expense of $5.1M equals about 0.4 cents per contributed dollar when donated medicine is counted, and about 40 cents per cash dollar when it is not (our calculations from Part IX, line 25). Both ratios are true, and neither is complete alone.
- MAP's FY2025 audited statements report that about 50% of noncash contribution revenue came from its three largest donors, who vary from year to year among a group of about 20.
- For any organization that accepts in-kind gifts, the lesson is to report and budget cash and in-kind as separate lines, because in-kind value is real program support but does not pay salaries or rent.
An organization that accepts donated goods should read MAP International's latest filing for one reason: it shows, at very large scale, why cash gifts and in-kind gifts belong on separate lines. For the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, MAP reported total revenue of $1,379.0M (FY2025 Form 990, Part I, line 12), up from $934.8M a year earlier (Part I, line 12, prior-year column). Of $1,375.4M in contributions, $1,362.5M were noncash (Part VIII, lines 1h and 1g), almost all of it donated medicine and health supplies. By our arithmetic, cash contributions were about $12.9M, compared with about $13.4M the year before (FY2024 Form 990, Part VIII). The headline revenue grew by 48% while cash giving stayed close to flat. This article explains why both facts are true and what a development director at a smaller organization can take from them.
What does the FY2025 filing show at a glance?
The table below collects the figures a careful reader would pull from the FY2025 Form 990 before interpreting any of them. The middle column is what the filing reports, with its part and line. The right column names the question each figure raises that only MAP's own records could answer.
| Metric | Public value (FY2025) | What the organization's records would confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Total revenue | $1,379.0M (Part I, line 12) | How much of the change came from a few product donors |
| Noncash contributions | $1,362.5M (Part VIII, line 1g) | Which companies donated, and how steady each one is |
| Cash contributions | About $12.9M (line 1h minus line 1g, our arithmetic) | How many individual donors gave cash, and how many gave again |
| Program service revenue | $3.4M handling and service fees (Part VIII, line 2a) | Which partners pay fees, and how that income moves with shipments |
| Total expenses | $1,344.5M (Part I, line 18) | Nothing donor-level, since most expense is product shipped |
| Fundraising expense | $5.1M (Part IX, line 25, column D) | How that spending splits between product partners and cash donors |
| Inventories, year-end | $337.1M (Part X, line 8) | When the product on hand is scheduled to ship |
| Employees and volunteers | 74 and 1,200 (Part I, lines 5 and 6) | Nothing further, since these are staffing counts |
What is MAP International doing well?
MAP International describes itself as "a Christ-centered global health organization" whose mission is "to provide medicine and health supplies to people in need around the world so they might experience life to the fullest" (MAP International, About). Its filing states the mission as a "global Christian health organization that works to save lives and promote health" (Part I, line 1). The model is simple to describe and hard to run. Pharmaceutical and health supply companies donate products, and MAP ships them to partners who deliver care. In August 2025, with two months of its fiscal year still to run, the organization announced that it had acquired over $1 billion in donated medicine and health supplies and distributed $1 billion worth that year, and called 2025 "the most impactful year in the organization's 70+ year history" (MAP International, August 2025).
The filing gives the reach in the organization's own program description. MAP reports working with 48 major partners to provide medicine and health supplies in 100 countries, reaching more than 1,654,000 children across 40 countries through a pediatric antibiotics initiative, and providing more than 346,000 treatments through 84 free and charitable clinic partners in the United States (Part III, line 4a). That work runs on a small staff: 74 employees and an estimated 1,200 volunteers (Part I, lines 5 and 6). The organization also tells cash donors plainly how their gifts relate to the product. Its financials page says that "every $1 delivers more than $65 in medicine and health supplies to people in need" (MAP International, Financials), an organization-reported figure that we have not recomputed. That sentence is the in-kind reporting lesson in the organization's own words: a cash gift is described by the product it moves, not blended into the product total.
What does the revenue path show?
| Category | Revenue | Expenses |
|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | $1018.9M | $839.8M |
| FY2024 | $934.8M | $926.3M |
| FY2025 | $1379.0M | $1344.5M |
Total revenue moved from about $1,018.9M to $934.8M to $1,379.0M over the three fiscal years shown (Part I, line 12, with FY2023 from the FY2024 filing). An organization whose revenue is mostly donated product will see swings like these, because the total depends on what product companies have available to donate in a given year. Our reading, which the filing cannot test, is that the year-to-year changes in the headline figure say more about product supply than about the number of people who support the organization.
The $34.6M by which FY2025 revenue exceeded expenses (Part I, line 19) needs the same care. Under the accounting policy in MAP's FY2025 audited statements, donated medicine is recorded as revenue when it is received, and the gifts are "recognized as expenses when they are shipped from the Organization's warehouse." Inventories rose from $303.8M to $337.1M during the year (Part X, line 8), an increase of about $33.3M. By our reading, most of the surplus is product received and not yet shipped, which is medicine on a shelf rather than cash in a bank account.
How different are the cash and in-kind stories?
Form 990 asks every organization to report total contributions on line 1h and to report, on line 1g, how much of that total was noncash. Subtracting line 1g from line 1h gives cash contributions. For MAP, that subtraction gives about $12.9M in FY2025 and about $13.4M in FY2024 (our arithmetic from the FY2025 filing and the FY2024 filing). Over a year when headline revenue rose by about $444M, cash contributions eased by about $0.5M.
| Category | Cash contributions |
|---|---|
| FY2024 | $13.4M |
| FY2025 | $12.9M |
The two lines can move independently. Donated medicine comes mainly from a small number of companies. MAP's FY2025 audited statements report that "approximately 50% ... of total noncash contribution revenue was sourced from the Organization's three largest donors," up from about 44% the year before, and that the three largest donors "generally vary among a group of approximately 20 donors." The filing does not break cash gifts out by type of donor. Cash is also what pays for the warehouse, the shipping coordination, the staff, and the fundraising itself. An organization that reads only the combined total would miss the fact that its cash base, the part that keeps the operation running, was about the same size in both years.
- Prescription drugs91%
- Over-the-counter medicine7%
- Medical supplies and equipment1%
| Segment | Value | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Prescription drugs | 1,245.4 | 91% |
| Over-the-counter medicine | 98 | 7% |
| Medical supplies and equipment | 18.9 | 1% |
What does it cost MAP to raise a dollar?
Form 990 splits expenses into three functions. Program services were $1,337.8M, management and general was $1.5M, and fundraising was $5.1M (Part IX, line 25, columns B, C, and D). Program services were about 99.5% of total expenses, and almost all of that was product shipped to partners: grants to organizations outside the United States alone were $1,244.5M (Part IX, line 3).
The cost to raise a dollar is fundraising expense divided by contributions, and here the choice of denominator changes the answer by a factor of about 100. Divided by all contributions, $5.1M of fundraising expense is about 0.4 cents per dollar. Divided by cash contributions only, it is about 40 cents per cash dollar, against about 50 cents the year before (FY2024 Form 990, Part IX, line 25, column D). All three ratios are our calculations. Neither denominator is complete by itself, because fundraising staff also cultivate the companies that donate product. The true cost per dollar sits somewhere between the two figures, and a filing cannot say where. What a reader can say is that a single blended ratio hides the question a board most needs answered: what does it cost to raise the cash that runs the organization?
| Measure | FY2024 (trend context) | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Fundraising expense (Part IX, line 25, column D) | $6.8M | $5.1M |
| Total contributions (Part VIII, line 1h) | $931.5M | $1,375.4M |
| Cash contributions (line 1h minus line 1g) | About $13.4M | About $12.9M |
| Fundraising per total contributed dollar | About 0.7 cents | About 0.4 cents |
| Fundraising per cash dollar | About 50 cents | About 40 cents |
What do the net assets represent?
| Category | Net assets, year-end |
|---|---|
| FY2023 | $314.5M |
| FY2024 | $323.7M |
| FY2025 | $358.7M |
Net assets were $358.7M at September 30, 2025 (Part I, line 22), of which $325.8M carried donor restrictions and $32.9M did not (Part X, lines 27 and 28). Year-end inventories were $337.1M (Part X, line 8), larger than the restricted balance. The audited statements make the link directly: $318.7M of the $325.8M in restricted net assets is "medicine and other gifts in-kind restricted for certain geographic regions" (FY2025 audited statements, Note H). Read that way, the $358.7M is mostly donated medicine and other in-kind gifts restricted to certain regions, not a cash reserve, and the unrestricted $32.9M is the figure closest to what the organization could direct to operations.
What can the public filing not reveal?
A Form 990 reports categories, and the questions that decide how well an organization stewards its cash donors are about individual people. The table lists the questions only the organization's own records can answer. The first two apply to any organization that accepts in-kind gifts, from a food pantry that takes grocery donations to a school that accepts equipment. Our guide to donor concentration risk covers the concentration question in detail.
| The question | The measure it needs | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| How many people give cash, and how many give again? | Cash donor count and 12-month retention | The cash base pays for operations and does not move with product supply |
| How steady is each in-kind donor? | Product value by donor across three or more years | When three donors supply half the product, one change reshapes the year |
| Do cash donors respond to impact updates? | Second-gift rate after an impact report | Product totals make vivid stories, and stories are what cash donors respond to |
| How concentrated is cash giving? | Share of cash from the top 1% of donors | A few large cash gifts can hide a shrinking base of smaller donors |
| What does a monthly cash donor return? | Two-year value of monthly donors against one-time donors | Predictable cash is what lets an organization plan shipping and staffing |
How would you sort the cash donor base?
Separately from the in-kind donors, and by the same method any organization should use. Rank cash donors by recency, frequency, and value, the RFM method that orders a list by who gave most recently, how often, and how much. Then place each donor in a lifecycle stage with a named next action. In-kind donors belong in a separate list managed as partnerships, because the next action for a pharmaceutical company is a relationship meeting, not an appeal letter.
| Stage | Who is in it | The next action |
|---|---|---|
| Acquire | First-time cash donors, including church and event donors | A thank-you that says what the gift moved, using the organization's own reported ratio |
| Convert | Donors who gave cash twice | An invitation to monthly giving, framed around predictable delivery |
| Retain | Monthly and repeat cash donors | Regular reports on shipments and partners, and a check on failed card payments |
| Reactivate | Cash donors with no gift in 13 months or more | A short note with one recent result and one clear invitation |
What can an organization that accepts in-kind gifts do now?
Each step below applies whether the in-kind gifts are medicine, food, used equipment, or donated services. In order of expected return:
- 1.Report cash contributions and in-kind contributions as two lines in every board report and budget, the way Form 990 lines 1g and 1h already separate them.
- 2.Compute the cost to raise a dollar twice, once on all contributions and once on cash only, and track both over time.
- 3.List in-kind donors by value for the last three years and note what share the top three supply, so the board sees concentration before it changes.
- 4.Measure cash donor retention on its own. Our guide to fundraising KPIs explains which retention rates belong on a dashboard.
- 5.Tell cash donors what their gift moves, as MAP's financials page does, so a cash gift is described by the product and care it delivers.
The sector baseline explains why the fourth step matters. In the Fundraising Effectiveness Project's Q4 2025 report, which covers 15,102 organizations, overall donor retention was 43.3% in 2025, meaning fewer than half of the donors who gave in 2024 gave again in 2025. That rate describes cash donors. It says nothing about product donors, which is one more reason to count the two groups separately.
“Overall retention edged up from 43.1% to 43.3%, with repeat donor retention improving.”
So what would you do next?
The public filing shows that MAP's cash contributions were about $12.9M in a year when its total revenue was $1,379.0M. It cannot show how many people gave that cash, how many gave again, or which of them are ready for a monthly gift. Those answers live in each organization's own giving records. Donor Insights reads those records and returns a prioritized action file: first-time cash donors due a second invitation, monthly donors with failed payments, and lapsed donors worth a personal note. The methodology starts from your own giving records, and your team runs each outreach step in its own tools.
From there the work is steady and familiar. You read cash and in-kind as separate lines, thank each cash donor with what their gift moved, and watch the cash base grow alongside the product that the organization delivers. To see your cash donor base measured on its own, start with your own file.
Frequently asked questions
- Did MAP International's giving fall while revenue rose?
- Cash contributions were about $12.9M in FY2025 against about $13.4M in FY2024, by our arithmetic from Part VIII, lines 1g and 1h, a change of about $0.5M. Total revenue rose by about $444M because donated medicine rose. The two lines move for different reasons, which is why they should be read separately.
- Is this article questioning how MAP values donated medicine?
- No. The values are audited. MAP's FY2025 audited statements explain that donated medicine is valued at wholesale acquisition cost using pricing references including First Databank. This article accepts those values and makes a reporting point: cash and in-kind gifts are different resources and should be shown as separate lines.
- Which fiscal year does this article cover?
- The fiscal year from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025, called FY2025 here. The IRS files that year on the version of Form 990 labeled 2024, because the year began in 2024. Prior years appear only as labeled trend context.
- Why are the net assets mostly restricted?
- Restricted net assets were $325.8M and year-end inventories were $337.1M (Part X, lines 28 and 8). The audited statements (Note H) report that $318.7M of the $325.8M is medicine and other in-kind gifts restricted to certain geographic regions. It is mostly donated medicine and other in-kind gifts restricted to certain regions, not a cash reserve.
- Is this analysis based on MAP International's private data?
- No. Every financial figure comes from MAP's public Form 990 as published by ProPublica, or from the audited financial statements MAP posts on its own website. No donor-level data is used, and every interpretation is labeled as ours.
- Our organization accepts a small amount of donated goods. Does this apply?
- Yes. The method applies at any size. Record in-kind gifts on a separate line from cash, compute the cost to raise a dollar on cash alone as well as on the total, and track which in-kind donors supply most of the value.
Sources
- MAP International (EIN 36-2586390), IRS Form 990 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025 (FY2025, filed on the 2024 form), full filing via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
- MAP International, IRS Form 990 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024 (FY2024, trend context), full filing via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer
- Batts Morrison Wales & Lee (2026). MAP International audited financial statements, years ended September 30, 2025 and 2024. Report dated February 23, 2026
- MAP International. About (mission and faith identity, accessed 2026)
- MAP International (2025). A record year for global health: MAP International delivers $1 billion in donated medicine and health supplies. August 13, 2025
- MAP International. Financials and credentials (organization-reported cash ratio, accessed 2026)
- Fundraising Effectiveness Project (2026). Q4 2025 report. 2025 data, 15,102 organizations
Related articles
Donor Concentration Risk: If One Major Donor Walks, What Breaks?
Most of your budget may depend on a handful of people. The fix starts with measuring exactly how few.
The 12 Fundraising KPIs Worth Putting on One Dashboard
Stop tracking forty metrics. These twelve tell you whether you are growing.
Corporate Giving Without a Corporate Team
You do not need a partnerships team. The corporate dollars you can reach ride the donors and volunteers you already have.
Disclaimer
Educational purpose. This article is published for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not investment, financial, funding, donor, tax, legal, accounting, or fundraising advice, and reading it creates no advisory, fiduciary, or client relationship. Consult your own qualified professionals before making decisions.
Not an offer. Nothing here is an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to buy, sell, donate to, or fund any organization or security. Pray, Inc. DonorInsights.com is not a registered investment adviser, broker-dealer, law firm, accounting firm, or fundraising counsel, and publishes only impersonal commentary of general and regular circulation.
Public data, no guarantee. Analyses of named organizations rely on public sources such as IRS Form 990 filings, an organization's own published materials, and reputable press. These sources are believed reliable but are not audited or independently verified by us. The content may contain errors or omissions and is provided "as is" with no warranties of accuracy, completeness, or currency.
Opinions and estimates. Donor-level and financial figures for named organizations are our inferences and opinions, including forward-looking projections that are not guarantees of future results.
No affiliation. Named organizations are independent and are not clients, affiliates, sponsors, or endorsers of DonorInsights.com. Third-party names and trademarks belong to their owners and are used only for identification and commentary. Links to third-party sites are not endorsements.
No reliance. We accept no liability for any action taken based on this content.
Corrections. This analysis reflects public sources available as of publication. If you are an organization discussed here, or any reader, and you believe a figure or statement is inaccurate, email hello@donorinsights.com and we will review it and correct any error promptly.
Your use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use.